JSU Lamson Documents
Item set
- Title
- JSU Lamson Documents
Items
-
District of Topeka Public Schools Answer to Question from Brown III Plaintiffs About the Long Range Facility Plan, June 29, 1983.Case Data and Exhibits for Brown III, a relitigation of Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) that corrected resegregation issues caused by open enrollment school choice in 1992. Document to the plaintiffs from the defense answering questions about the district’s Long Range Facility Plan and its effect on the racial makeup of schools.
-
District of Topeka Public Schools Answer to Question from Brown III Plaintiffs About Separation and Segregation of Teachers and Other Employees on the Basis of Race, July 25, 1983.Case Data and Exhibits for Brown III, a relitigation of Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) that corrected resegregation issues caused by open enrollment school choice in 1992. Document to the plaintiffs from the defense answering questions about the separation and segregation of teachers and other employees on the basis of Race.
-
A Memorandum from ACLU Attorney Jon C. Dubin to Brown III Co-Counsel With an Update on Evidence Discovery for the Trial, August 22, 1983.Case Data and Exhibits for Brown III, a relitigation of Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) that corrected resegregation issues caused by open enrollment school choice in 1992. In this memo, CLU Attorney Jon C. Dubin updates other Brown III Co-Counsel on the evidence discovery process and summarizes where the entire process currently stands.
-
A Position Statement from the Defense Attorneys Arguing that Some Requests for Evidence from the Plaintiffs are Unduly Burdensome, December 3, 1982.Case Data and Exhibits for Brown III, a relitigation of Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) that corrected resegregation issues caused by open enrollment school choice in 1992. In this position statement, the defense argues that certain requests for documents from the plaintiff team are “unduly burdensome” because of time constraints.
-
Supplemental Memorandum from Plaintiff Attorneys in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Evidence from the Defendants, December 1982.Case Data and Exhibits for Brown III, a relitigation of Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) that corrected resegregation issues caused by open enrollment school choice in 1992. Supplemental memorandum from the plaintiff attorney team to the court in support of the plaintiffs’ prior motion to compel evidence from the defendants.
-
Affidavits from Topeka School District Defendants Frank Ybarra, Gerald A. Miller, Don R. O'Neill, Wayne Warner, and Michael Tribbey, December 2, 1982.Case Data and Exhibits for Brown III, a relitigation of Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) that corrected resegregation issues caused by open enrollment school choice in 1992. Four affidavits from Topeka School District defendants presenting arguments of why some documents requested by the plaintiff attorneys cannot be produced on time.
-
A Protective Order from United States District Judge Richard D. Rogers that Places Limitations on Some of the Documents Requested of the Defendants by the Plaintiff Attorneys, March 18, 1983.Case Data and Exhibits for Brown III, a relitigation of Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) that corrected resegregation issues caused by open enrollment school choice in 1992. This court order places limitations on some of the documents requested by the defense due to redundancy and personal information that is included in some records.
-
District of Topeka Public Schools Answers to Questions from Brown III Plaintiffs Providing Information About Student Transfers and Reassignments between 1940 and 1950, June 30, 1983.Case Data and Exhibits for Brown III, a relitigation of Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) that corrected resegregation issues caused by open enrollment school choice in 1992. Document to the plaintiffs from the defense answering questions about student transfers and reassignments in Topeka schools between 1940 and 1950.
-
District of Topeka Public Schools Answers to Questions from Brown III Plaintiffs Providing Information About Individual Schools in Topeka Between 1950 and 1980, April 2, 1981.Case Data and Exhibits for Brown III, a relitigation of Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) that corrected resegregation issues caused by open enrollment school choice in 1992. Document to the plaintiffs from the defense answering questions about Topeka schools construction dates, opening dates, and closing dates between 1950-1980.
-
Court Brief for Individually Named Defendants Associated With the State Board of Education of Kansas, August 20, 1987.Case Data and Exhibits for Brown III, a relitigation of Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) that corrected resegregation issues caused by open enrollment school choice in 1992. Court brief that upholds the rulings in favor of the individually named members of the State Board of Education of Kansas not being complicit in school segregation.
-
Memorandum and Order from United States District Judge Richard D. Rogers that Presents the Court’s Decision on the 1986 Phase of the Brown III Case, April 9, 1987.Case Data and Exhibits for Brown III, a relitigation of Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) that corrected resegregation issues caused by open enrollment school choice in 1992. In this court order, United States District Judge Richard D. Rogers denies the plaintiffs' claims for relief, writing "the district has a unitary system of education."
-
Document Summarizing the Supplemental Responses Received from the Defendant State Board of Education of Kansas, December 12, 1982.Case Data and Exhibits for Brown III, a relitigation of Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) that corrected resegregation issues caused by open enrollment school choice in 1992. A document that lists a summary of all supplemental responses to the Plaintiff attorneys submitted by the defendant State Board of Education of Kansas.
-
A Motion of Substitution From the Defense Requesting Three Defendants be Removed as Parties to the Action of the Brown III Case, December 22, 1982.Case Data and Exhibits for Brown III, a relitigation of Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) that corrected resegregation issues caused by open enrollment school choice in 1992. A motion of substitution from the defense team requesting that 3 people be removed as parties from the case because they are no longer members of the school board.
-
A Motion From the Defense Requesting That a List of Ten More Defendants be Allowed to Assist in Answering Plaintiff Interrogatories, December 22, 1982.Case Data and Exhibits for Brown III, a relitigation of Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) that corrected resegregation issues caused by open enrollment school choice in 1992. A motion from the defense team requesting that the ten additional defendants listed in the motion be allowed to assist in answering plaintiff interrogatories.
-
A List of Questions From the Plaintiff Attorneys to the Defendants Associated With the State of Kansas and the State Department of Education to be Answered Within Forty Days, June 1, 1982.Case Data and Exhibits for Brown III, a relitigation of Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) that corrected resegregation issues caused by open enrollment school choice in 1992. Document from the plaintiff attorneys to the defendants associated with the state of Kansas and the State Department of Education listing questions to be answered.
-
Plaintiff Attorneys Answers to Defendant Attorneys Questions Regarding the Schools the Plaintiffs Claim were Segregated Since 1950, March 10, 1982.Case Data and Exhibits for Brown III, a relitigation of Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) that corrected resegregation issues caused by open enrollment school choice in 1992. Document from the plaintiff attorneys to the defense in response to questions from the defense about which Topeka schools were segregated since 1950.
-
A List of the First Set of Defense Attorneys Responses to Plaintiff Attorneys Requesting Answers to Questions Brought Up by the Plaintiffs Original Interrogatories, October 5, 1981.Case Data and Exhibits for Brown III, a relitigation of Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) that corrected resegregation issues caused by open enrollment school choice in 1992. Document to the plaintiffs from the defense requesting answers to questions brought up by the plaintiff’s first set of interrogatories.
-
A Kansas Department of Public Instruction Order Organizing a Unified School District in Topeka, Kansas, and Disorganizing all Non-Unified School Districts, January 1, 1966.Case Data and Exhibits for Brown III, a relitigation of Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) that corrected resegregation issues caused by open enrollment school choice in 1992. A 1966 order from the Kansas Department of Public Instruction to create a unified school district in Topeka, Kansas, and an administrative structure for the district.
-
Plaintiff Attorneys Response to Defendant John C. Carlin's Motion to Compel, November 11, 1982.Case Data and Exhibits for Brown III, a relitigation of Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) that corrected resegregation issues caused by open enrollment school choice in 1992. Document from the plaintiff attorneys to the defense in response to questions from the defense, which the plaintiffs can’t fully answer because of missing documents.
-
Questions Submitted to the Brown III Plaintiff Attorneys by Defendant John Carlin, Governor of Kansas, July 6, 1982.Case Data and Exhibits for Brown III, a relitigation of Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) that corrected resegregation issues caused by open enrollment school choice in 1992. Document containing questions submitted to the Brown III Plaintiff Attorneys by Defendant John Carlin, Governor of Kansas.
-
District of Topeka Public Schools Answers to Questions from Brown III Plaintiffs Seeking Information About the Creation of the School District and Its Administrative Organization, January 29, 1981.Case Data and Exhibits for Brown III, a relitigation of Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) that corrected resegregation issues caused by open enrollment school choice in 1992. Document to the plaintiffs from the defense in response to a question about the creation of the school district and how it is presently governed.
-
District of Topeka Public Schools Answers to Questions from Brown III Plaintiffs Seeking Information on Optional Attendance Zones Within the District, June 14, 1983.Case Data and Exhibits for Brown III, a relitigation of Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) that corrected resegregation issues caused by open enrollment school choice in 1992. Document to the plaintiffs from the defense in response to questions about optional attendance zones, including why they exist, how they are evaluated, and more.
-
District of Topeka Public Schools Answers to Questions from Brown III Plaintiffs Seeking Information on Teacher School Assignments, October 18, 1982.Case Data and Exhibits for Brown III, a relitigation of Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) that corrected resegregation issues caused by open enrollment school choice in 1992. Document to the plaintiffs from the defense in response to questions about teacher school assignments, current assignments, race of teacher, year hired, and more.
-
District of Topeka Public Schools Answers to Questions from Brown III Plaintiffs Seeking Information on How Vocational Programs are Funded, October 29, 1982.Case Data and Exhibits for Brown III, a relitigation of Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) that corrected resegregation issues caused by open enrollment school choice in 1992. Document to the plaintiffs from the defense in response to a question about how the vocational training programs have been and are currently being funded.
-
District of Topeka Public Schools Answers to Questions from Brown III Plaintiffs Seeking Information on Each of the Vocational Training Programs in the District, October 29, 1982.Case Data and Exhibits for Brown III, a relitigation of Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) that corrected resegregation issues caused by open enrollment school choice in 1992. Document to the plaintiffs from the defense in response to questions about vocational training programs, including names of schools, types of training, and more.